Comments for Corrected By Reality http://www.correctedbyreality.com Exploring that which exists objectively and in fact Tue, 06 Jan 2009 09:57:16 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 Comment on Evil and Wickedness by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4402 totovader Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:38:19 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4402 By the way, Kingfillins- as I have told you several times already, if you want to discuss topics of your own, and want to present your evidence to a group of individuals who are all rational, fair, and almost as patient as I am- then I suggest you join the JREF forums and post your claims there. By the way, Kingfillins- as I have told you several times already, if you want to discuss topics of your own, and want to present your evidence to a group of individuals who are all rational, fair, and almost as patient as I am- then I suggest you join the JREF forums and post your claims there.

]]> Comment on Evil and Wickedness by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4401 totovader Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:36:13 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4401 Kingfillins, if you think that you're banning comes from me being afraid of you- you're wrong. You were given at least a dozen opportunities to stay on topic, post relevant material, and stop your spamming tirade. In every single case you decided to try and derail the discussion and harass me instead. You following me here and posting material that is also irrelevant is just a continuation of that behavior. Any rational person should be able to recognize that- you don't seem to be able to, however. You are not being silenced, kiddo- you are just not being given an opportunity to derail any further conversation or take up any more of my time in my forums. My forums are for individuals who can stay on topic, who can discuss the topics I am curious about and not go into a spamming tirade. You are wasting space and not allowing others to engage in this debate. You being allowed to continue threatens rational discourse. My skills have been used wisely- they have aided me in showing that you are an irrational conspiracist. Unfortunately, they have also allowed you too much ego: you think that you can make claims, avoid providing any evidence for them, and then waste enough space and time to get banned and then suddenly my skills are threatened in your mind. We call that suicide by mod- there's a reason you had to keep spamming and harassing me: you have no evidence. You squandered every opportunity to present evidence for a claim you already made, and every single time it's the same story: "no wait! unblock me, now I've got it!" and then when I do, you just toss out the same ad hominem and dodge the question over and over. Your failures are your own- they have nothing to do with me, my website, or my YouTube page. Kingfillins, if you think that you’re banning comes from me being afraid of you- you’re wrong. You were given at least a dozen opportunities to stay on topic, post relevant material, and stop your spamming tirade. In every single case you decided to try and derail the discussion and harass me instead. You following me here and posting material that is also irrelevant is just a continuation of that behavior. Any rational person should be able to recognize that- you don’t seem to be able to, however.

You are not being silenced, kiddo- you are just not being given an opportunity to derail any further conversation or take up any more of my time in my forums. My forums are for individuals who can stay on topic, who can discuss the topics I am curious about and not go into a spamming tirade. You are wasting space and not allowing others to engage in this debate. You being allowed to continue threatens rational discourse.

My skills have been used wisely- they have aided me in showing that you are an irrational conspiracist. Unfortunately, they have also allowed you too much ego: you think that you can make claims, avoid providing any evidence for them, and then waste enough space and time to get banned and then suddenly my skills are threatened in your mind. We call that suicide by mod- there’s a reason you had to keep spamming and harassing me: you have no evidence. You squandered every opportunity to present evidence for a claim you already made, and every single time it’s the same story: “no wait! unblock me, now I’ve got it!” and then when I do, you just toss out the same ad hominem and dodge the question over and over.

Your failures are your own- they have nothing to do with me, my website, or my YouTube page.

]]> Comment on Evil and Wickedness by king http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4400 king Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:09:33 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/05/26/evil-and-wickedness/#comment-4400 Dear totovader. I received your comment on my you tube channel. Could you explain why you think I am harassing you? I respect your opinion. You asked me to provide you with some evidence. I found this evidence. To create the context for the evidence I posted closely related evidence and then before I could post the specific conclusive evidence you blocked me. I then posted it on this site yet you are still not interested in it. Why is this? Your "about me" page says "Never stop learning". I have supplied you with evidence from the US congress. When it come to the subject we discussed it is difficult to find cut and dry "evidence" but it is possible to find evidence that sets a scene and time frame which is important to the topic. This was not intended as spam but as I have said to set the scene. The US Congress evidence is fact and clearly links Bin Laden with the US. If you dispute this evidence fair enough. But to block me is rather childish. Especially when you make comment on my you tube page and offer me no way of reply. I wonder if the "reality" that you refer to is simply your own reality. Possibly you could change your site name to "Corrected By Me" instead. If my posts where so incorrect surly to leave them next to my name would make me look dumb and even dumber with you pointing out these mistakes. Bruce Lee did not need to delete his opponents challenge or hide. He met them like a true master and employed his skill. I enjoyed our conversations on your Conspiracy Challenge youtube site and wish you well. Kind Regards, King. Dear totovader.

I received your comment on my you tube channel. Could you explain why you think I am harassing you? I respect your opinion.

You asked me to provide you with some evidence. I found this evidence. To create the context for the evidence I posted closely related evidence and then before I could post the specific conclusive evidence you blocked me.

I then posted it on this site yet you are still not interested in it. Why is this?

Your “about me” page says “Never stop learning”. I have supplied you with evidence from the US congress.

When it come to the subject we discussed it is difficult to find cut and dry “evidence” but it is possible to find evidence that sets a scene and time frame which is important to the topic. This was not intended as spam but as I have said to set the scene.

The US Congress evidence is fact and clearly links Bin Laden with the US.

If you dispute this evidence fair enough. But to block me is rather childish. Especially when you make comment on my you tube page and offer me no way of reply.

I wonder if the “reality” that you refer to is simply your own reality. Possibly you could change your site name to “Corrected By Me” instead.

If my posts where so incorrect surly to leave them next to my name would make me look dumb and even dumber with you pointing out these mistakes.

Bruce Lee did not need to delete his opponents challenge or hide. He met them like a true master and employed his skill.

I enjoyed our conversations on your Conspiracy Challenge youtube site and wish you well.

Kind Regards,

King.

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-3403 totovader Tue, 12 Aug 2008 11:55:10 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-3403 What, Beatsme? You don't claim to know what happened... but you claim to know what DIDN'T happen? And why are we supposed to believe you- just because you don't like the government and witnesses? What, Beatsme? You don’t claim to know what happened… but you claim to know what DIDN’T happen? And why are we supposed to believe you- just because you don’t like the government and witnesses?

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by beatsMe http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-3394 beatsMe Tue, 12 Aug 2008 04:48:27 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-3394 Look, I don't claim to know what happened to the damn plane. To tell the truth, I don't really care. I know it wasn't giant laser space frisbee holograms like the batty people say, and I know it might not have been shot down. But I'm almost certain of one thing, and that the official version- read, handed-down-from-government-people-close-to-what-happened-version is ABSOLUTELY without a doubt full of shitty shit. Look, I don’t claim to know what happened to the damn plane. To tell the truth, I don’t really care. I know it wasn’t giant laser space frisbee holograms like the batty people say, and I know it might not have been shot down. But I’m almost certain of one thing, and that the official version- read, handed-down-from-government-people-close-to-what-happened-version
is ABSOLUTELY without a doubt full of shitty shit.

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-147 totovader Sat, 22 Mar 2008 00:41:12 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-147 "The truth about Totovader"... that's a good one. Like tanabear makes any sense. You're just pissed off because you can't support your argument, so 2 MONTHS LATER you come back here and whine about it. tanabear's claim was addressed on the JREF forums- http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=108972 “The truth about Totovader”… that’s a good one. Like tanabear makes any sense. You’re just pissed off because you can’t support your argument, so 2 MONTHS LATER you come back here and whine about it.

tanabear’s claim was addressed on the JREF forums- http://forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=108972

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by Veritas http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-146 Veritas Fri, 21 Mar 2008 23:24:58 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-146 For the truth about Totovader visit: http://tanabear911.blogspot.com/2008/02/games-people-play.html For the truth about Totovader visit:
http://tanabear911.blogspot.com/2008/02/games-people-play.html

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-65 totovader Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:47:25 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-65 I'm saying the result of the terrorist attack and the result of a conspiracy theory which has real terrorists and real passengers would be the same... how is that even worth paying attention to? I'm assuming that if you believe that real passengers really tried to take over the plane hijacked by real terrorists... the phone calls would have to be real as well. If you think they're not... then you have a very big contradiction you have to resolve. I’m saying the result of the terrorist attack and the result of a conspiracy theory which has real terrorists and real passengers would be the same… how is that even worth paying attention to?

I’m assuming that if you believe that real passengers really tried to take over the plane hijacked by real terrorists… the phone calls would have to be real as well. If you think they’re not… then you have a very big contradiction you have to resolve.

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by Veritas http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-64 Veritas Tue, 29 Jan 2008 21:36:17 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-64 Why would it necessarily contradict the "no phone calls"? Shadowy alternate landing? You're pulling fragments from different theories and trying to say they're the same and therefore contradictory. Who said the highjackers were "the exact same characters"? The results are not the same because the debris field is so vastly spread out. Why would it necessarily contradict the “no phone calls”? Shadowy alternate landing? You’re pulling fragments from different theories and trying to say they’re the same and therefore contradictory. Who said the highjackers were “the exact same characters”? The results are not the same because the debris field is so vastly spread out.

]]> Comment on Flight 93 and the Conspiracist Narrative by totovader http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-63 totovader Tue, 29 Jan 2008 18:10:22 +0000 http://www.correctedbyreality.com/2008/01/21/flight-93-and-the-conspiracist-narrative/#comment-63 Again, REAL passengers... REAL hijackers? That contradicts the theory of some kind of shadowy alternate landing or really any conspiracy theory in the first place. It would necessarily contradict the claims of "no phone calls", and brings into question the entire point of some kind of inside job theory anyway... Now all the sudden it's an inside job with the exact same characters and the exact same results? Again, REAL passengers… REAL hijackers? That contradicts the theory of some kind of shadowy alternate landing or really any conspiracy theory in the first place. It would necessarily contradict the claims of “no phone calls”, and brings into question the entire point of some kind of inside job theory anyway… Now all the sudden it’s an inside job with the exact same characters and the exact same results?

]]>